MechMate CNC Router Forum

Go Back   MechMate CNC Router Forum > Miscellaneous hardware and software > Miscellaneous / General / Whatever / Catchall
Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old Wed 13 July 2011, 11:42
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Richards,
Your way beyond be in knowledge on cnc building. I don't want to be in anyway disrespectable of your comments. I hope you don't take it that way.

I found some 23 motors that are 400 oz/in. for $69. Mine are 260 oz/in. That's about $300 for 4. Motor dealer No plans to enlarge table to 4'x4' or 4'x8'. A 2'x4' is a nice size plasma table for a home shop. The gantry will be across the 2' width, very low weight. If I find the 260 oz/in is too small, it will be easy to change to the 400 oz/in motors. Expenses continue to pile up in the black hole, I call my shop. DRO for the Mill $700, height control on plasma table $500, A $4000 power tube roller underway, building on the cheap $600.

MetalHead,
For the last year I've been building leadscrews and bushing blocks. How do I know that lead screws are not the way to go on a cnc table...

Last edited by Vern2; Wed 13 July 2011 at 11:50..
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old Wed 13 July 2011, 12:16
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
MetalHead,
For the last year I've been building leadscrews and bushing blocks. How do I know that lead screws are not the way to go on a cnc tables... I need one part made, just one, on another project. So I'm starting the plasma table build again. I don't want to spend $12 to $20k for a plasma table. It's really more fun building one yourself. My projects come with no completion dates. I know the plasma table will come in handy, for many projects. It's fun to meet people that build things, that's all I've every wanted to do.

Last edited by Vern2; Wed 13 July 2011 at 12:36..
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old Wed 13 July 2011, 21:39
KenC
Just call me: Ken
 
Klang
Malaysia
260oz-in? I use those for my bench top CNC toy.
Bite the bullet & write off the bad purchase, you will get better price if the motors are NIB condition on Ebay. you can also get Nema34 at less then US$69... if you scrounge hard enough...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 07:05
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
KenC,

Ebay:
About getting 4 motors exactly the same. I don't want to try and cut a circle and get an oval. That may not make sense, but that's what I envision.

You guys are going to cause me to buy 34's!

I need some DXF software, bought CorelDraw last night. Will be looking for a free program to convert DXF to m-code then tweak it a little for simple 2D parts.

I actually have the "z" working through USB and CAD software.

Don't laugh it works.


Vern
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 09:40
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Looks like their is 400 oz/in 23 motors. This way I can move up to larger motors if I need to. That way I can keep my drivers with the 23's. New drivers for 34's are $147 each, new 34's are $99.95, total $1000.

Vern
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 13:06
danilom
Just call me: Danilo #64
 
Novi Sad
Serbia
contact Deitech for drives, last time I checked they had drives for half of that price.
www.driver-motor.com/Products.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 15:14
Richards
Just call me: Mike
 
South Jordan, UT
United States of America
In this type of forum, we all share our experiences. When one poster says that something works for him, and he includes enough data so we can see what he is using and why that motor/driver/power supply worked for him, we can draw conclusions about whether it might work for us.

On the other hand, when a poster writes that a particular motor/driver/power supply might NOT work and if he gives sufficient data so that we can see why he thinks that the user should try something else, we can draw conclusions about whether it might work for us.

Under the right circumstances, a 23 size motor MIGHT work in a CNC application, whether that application is traditional or whether it is something like plasma cutting. We all know that a size 34 motor, IF used with the correct gearing, power supply and driver, WILL work. So the question is whether we want to take a chance on something that MIGHT work, or whether we want to use something that others have proven DOES work.

I've spent many thousands of dollars finding out what MIGHT work. When I've proved that it DOES work, I've used it. Now, I play it safe and save my money. I use things that others have tested, things that others have tried, things that others have wasted their money on proving that they actually do work.

Motors are expensive. Drivers are expensive. Power supplies are expensive. It's best to let others pay the price of innovation and use only what they have found to be reliable solutions.

False economy is using the wrong part and then having to replace it because it was too small.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 16:08
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Richards,

I think there is a slow progression of cost in the three steps.

Plan (A): Build table with the motors, drivers I have. Cost $0.00

Plan (B): Change from 260 oz to 400 oz. I can reuse everything. It's just a motor change. Cost $278.60

Plan (C): Buy everything. 4 - 34 motors, 4 - drivers, rebuild new motor plates, 4 new 1/2" bore pulleys and belts. $1000 +, major cost.

Is there major parts I'm missing?

Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Thu 14 July 2011 at 16:12..
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 16:30
danilom
Just call me: Danilo #64
 
Novi Sad
Serbia
I had a comment but Richards said it all.

Why do you need new drives in Plan(C) ? What gecko's do you have? They all pretty much can drive nema34 given the right specs (current and voltage(inductance))
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 17:31
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Thank you for responding and checking my list.

danilom,

I bought 251 geco drivers http://www.geckodrive.com/g251x-p-38.html, they are limited to 3.5 amps. I have to get the 203 geco drivers $. When you get above 400 oz/in the amps seem to go above 3.5 amps for 34's. The 400 oz/in motors are not available or very hard to find. I have to go to 650 oz/in motors that need more then 3.5 amps. I really hope you can find that the geco 251 drivers will work for 34 motors, I'll get 34's. With drivers and 34's it's $1000.

Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Thu 14 July 2011 at 17:47..
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old Thu 14 July 2011, 17:51
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
I've got a 6" roter table, for the mill, haven't found a use for it yet, maybe now. The small table should make bearing pockets for me in 3/8" aluminum for motor plates. A while ago I went to a CNC builder and bought 2 each of all his bearings, So when I need a bearing I can grab one thats close and measure it. This one measures .496" bore, .312" width, will work good on 3/8" aluminum plate. If the bearing fits my needs, I place an order. The aluminum motor plates might be easy to build. Build some stand-offs for the pulley gap and recess tapered head bolts, to keep the back-side smooth 20# spring for pivot for rack and pinion matting, done. Have to buy some 3/8" aluminum plate.

Last edited by Vern2; Thu 14 July 2011 at 18:07..
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 01:53
danilom
Just call me: Danilo #64
 
Novi Sad
Serbia
Well they are being used a lot, but in form of Geckodrive G540 which has 4 of them integrated.
Look here for information
http://www.mechmate.com/forums/showt...highlight=g540
http://www.mechmate.com/forums/showt...highlight=g540

also search the forum for G540 to find other threads of users which are using them.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 02:19
KenC
Just call me: Ken
 
Klang
Malaysia
There are a lot free open source software out there which can produce .dxf. you could had saved that for your 34s.
Personally, I will spend time looking for other saving rather then hoarding over the 24s. This is my preference, everyone has their own.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 03:03
danilom
Just call me: Danilo #64
 
Novi Sad
Serbia
Like DraftSight from Dassault

http://www.3ds.com/products/draftsig...-cad-software/
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 06:59
KenC
Just call me: Ken
 
Klang
Malaysia
Coraldraw Equivalent free open source such as Inkscape, GIMP2 just to name two...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 09:29
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
You guys are great as usual!

I found a way to use my drivers (gecko-251's) on this 34 motor. $100 34 stepper There was a couple of requirements. 1) it had to find 8 wire motors. 2) a configuration at 3.5 amps or less. I can wire it as a Series connect, taking the 8 wires to 4, for the 251drivers.

I've been using draw programs for many years. There basically the same, nothing to learn for me. I just need to get on the CAM program manual. You guys have to realize that plasma tables are all 2D.

Will this motor work?



Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Fri 15 July 2011 at 09:33..
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 09:54
bradm
Just call me: Brad #10
 
Somerville(MA)
United States of America
In series, the inductance is pretty high, and Geckos don't like that. I think you want to use bipolar half-coil (which you can do with either 6 or 8 wire motors). That should have the same numbers as the unipolar column. Driving at 3.5A, you will not get the full torque, (guesstimate: about 350 OzIn, projecting from the table above).

A common G540 configuration, and the one I use, is with the OM motors with 7.2 gear reduction. Although the motor in this configuration is rated for higher amperage alone, the gear box torque ratings make the maximum safe amperage lower.

You will be in a similar situation. Since your plasma won't be seeing cutting forces, you may not need a transmission to multiply your torque.

So with the small boost in torque, why go with the larger motors? Because, as mentioned above, the 1/2" vs 1/4" shaft and corresponding bearings will be much more robust. I agree with the crowd; you'll save more $$ and hassle with the 34s.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 11:09
chopper
Just call me: chopper
 
Big Lake Minnesota
United States of America
Vern,
you can run the nema 23 motors and the 4 to on belt drives with out issue...
you do not need to worry about the belt wrap on the pulleys yeah I know it is less than what is recommended but there are no issues, I designed the drives that metal head is selling, and I am currently building a plasma cutter based on the MM using nema 23 motors, all you have to do is drill the smaller pattern for the 23's instead of the 34's you can see them here http://www.mechmate.com/forums/showt...6&postcount=93
and a few posts down there are drawings on how to build them...the only thing I have done different is I changed from a 20 tooth gear to a 30 tooth gear, because I wore out the smaller dia pinions this changes the ratio but I actually got better cuts with the 30's than the 20's... you also have to take into consideration that the MM's are pushing against material when they cut which takes more torque and power the plasma just moves the torch above the material and has no real load against it unless you crash..
but the wost thing that happens is the pinions walk out of the racks, if you have any questions you can pm me, if you like I will give you my phone number or regular email address, I don't spend much time here any more. if you are going to use reductions I would go with belt ( little or no back lash) vrs gear. I have been blasted in the past for these thoughts, but it seems that most are coming around to my line of thinking...I think you could also direct drive without the reductions see if that works then you can always use the plasma cutter to build your transmissions..
good luck .
//chopper

Last edited by chopper; Fri 15 July 2011 at 11:12..
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 20:50
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
chopper, (sent PM)

Maybe there is light at the end of the plasma tunnel.

Thanks for the link. Great stuff.

Here may be a problem. This is a video of z axes motor spinning. It just seems to slow. I may be building a gear box that speeds up the motor. I try to speed it up in software and the stepper starts to chatter. I can take a video of that, if needed.

Do I have a speed problem?

stepper trouble

Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Fri 15 July 2011 at 20:55..
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 21:23
danilom
Just call me: Danilo #64
 
Novi Sad
Serbia
If you are using 24V for power supply that is the problem.

Are these your motors? at inductance of 3.5mH , voltage at which you could spin them fast as you would like is about 50V
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 22:43
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
The motor in question may not be used. It's an odd ball motor I have. The other motors are not connected yet, only Z.

Here are the spec on the right motors not connected yet. The odd ball motor is being used because the other motors are on backorder. I just thought it was 24v like the others, I've got no spec on the odd ball motor, the wrong motor was shipped to me. I went to order 34's, there on backorder also. Spec. on both below.

260 Oz In. Hybrid
1.8° /200 Steps Per Rev.
2.5 Amps Current Per Phase
12-24 Volts
4-wire Bi-polar
NEMA 23 Frame

600 Oz In. Hybrid
1.8° /200 Steps Per Rev.
6 Amps Current Per Phase (Bi-polar)
8-wire Uni-polar or Bi-polar
NEMA 34 Frame
Single Shaft

Last edited by Vern2; Fri 15 July 2011 at 22:52..
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old Fri 15 July 2011, 23:24
KenC
Just call me: Ken
 
Klang
Malaysia
(MetalHead has made a few edits to this post)

Vern, numbers on the specs. sheet are almost useless to the actual motor selection process. The most useful numbers on the data sheet is the Inductance per phase, current rating & number of wire. other numbers which actually contribute a tiny bit is the torque number.

(edit - removed text)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old Sat 16 July 2011, 08:51
chopper
Just call me: chopper
 
Big Lake Minnesota
United States of America
(MetalHead has made a few edits to this post)

Vern,
I would like to clarify I in no way am saying that the exact motors you have will work, what I am saying is nema 23's will work...I did not look at your spec's I was responding to the " the belt do not have enough wrap" and the nema 23's are to small statements, I am using the nema 23's currently on a plasma cutter, ( with my 4 to 1 drives) and I am telling you as for a fact that they do work, a company called candcnc use's nema 23's plasma cam uses them, torchmate uses them etc.. etc... EDIT Text Ken you do not need large motors for plasma in fact you want the smaller motors with less rotor inertia to maintain a more even velocity when making corners, if the machine has to ramp up and down a lot when making a corner it will result in poor quality cuts most plasma cutters use nema 23's..... if you have the right electrical spec's on your stuff, and you are using 260 ozin motors and a 4 to 1 reduction the would put you at 1040 ozin of torque (Edit Text), I use 450 ozin nema 34's on my machine and they work perfectly...Edit TextThis does go out side the norm or at least the MM norm, Edit Text

(Edit Text) Most are going to the belt drives. The geared motors have to much back lash. The norm was the geared Oriental motors and now the norm seems to be belt drives. I did see this coming.

(Edit Text) I must have done something right metalhead is using my drives, I can cut stainless, steel, aluminum, and get get great cuts...

I have (Edit Text) proved this, and that the 4 to 1 drives work. (Edit Text),

Vern, this is why I wanted to go the pm route,
//chopper
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old Sat 16 July 2011, 09:23
smreish
Just call me: Sean - #5, 28, 58 and others
 
Orlando, Florida
United States of America
Ok, before the whole forum goes into "he said, she said" let's all call a truce.
It's clear (to me at least) that Vern is trying to find a way, either by reason, experience, cost or rationale that the motor's he has will work for his application.

The only true way to calculate what you need is by calculating the basics of your machine requirements. The root of all that starts with KNOWING what your force requirement needs to be with adequate headroom.

This is called drawbar - the force needed to move and object along a path with regards to its resistance which takes into account a lot of forces like (rolling, skidding, breakover friction, inertia, friction due to materials, and many more)

For instance, the drawbar for a MM gantry (my #5 machine) was roughly .6 to 1.8# unloaded and not cutting, upto 20# fully loaded and cutting)
A plasma (non contact cutter) will have similar values on the unloaded value if not using a "contact and skidding tip).



Summary should show that you need to know all the requirements of the motor / driver / mechanical transmission you choose.

Some tid bits of those things you NEED to know to make a proper choice:

- overhung load the torque induces on the shaft which will dictate the shaft diameter required to transmit the torque from the motor to the transmission (thus why Nema 23 are often not suggested due to shaft diameter and grub screws not rated for the load even though the motor can produce the amount of force required)
- rack and pinion and ball screws have different friction a requirements
- motors are selected by knowing what torque you need at what speed. Thus a direct coorelation of HP which is HP=550#/ft/sec. Which in our world comes down to ozin and inches per minute.
- duty cycle or service duty (it might work for 30% of the time, but not continous duty due to heat, wire windings, etc.)


Fortunately for the MM community, the machine was designed and engineered by one person with the knowledge and background that accounts for all these variables and came up with a design that works. The forum here supports THAT design and it's varients that meet the original requirements. If you choose to go off the reservation with a machine design that doesn't meet this forum needs, then it's all on you to make sound choices. It's up to us in the forum to keep it clean and responses clear and not full of "spirited jibbing".
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old Sat 16 July 2011, 15:49
MetalHead
Just call me: Mike
 
Columbiana AL
United States of America
I have made a few edits in a few of these posts because I think the content is one that is worth leaving in the post. Like Sean said, lets keep to the topics and not poke at each other. Please PM me if you have questions.

I think that it has been proven with the MM design that you can proceed with your build as your budget has allowed. Your mileage in the support area will vary and if you go off the norm.

MechMate systems are installed all over the globe and we can support them here as long as they are built to what is known to work and as you can see we encourage everyone to "Stick to the Plan".

I will say some are going belt drive and some are staying with the geared systems. Some even have NEMA 23 drives working. I did use chopper's design when we all worked on the thread to come up with other possibilities for the larger belt drive configuration plates. I have been shipping 3.3:1 pullies for these plates, but they do support up to 4:1 pullies like chopper designed.

Vern - you can see a lot of options on how to build your MechMate here on this forum. We try to keep the forum focused so new people can research and learn how the MechMate works withing a few slight design "updates" that do not effect the overall quality of the design.

You will make your decision on how to procedd based on your particular situation. But if your design is to far out of the norm, folks here may not be willing or able to answer your questions.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old Tue 19 July 2011, 09:59
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Thanks guys.

I have on order 4 - 400 oz/in 34's and 48v, 8.3 amp power supply. I bought the small motors for plasma table 3' x 5'. Just a home shop table. That way my drivers do not have to be replaced. The cost was less then $400.

One big thing I want to cutout on the plasma table is security, glass and screen door art. They will be large insert drawings of cowboy art, mountains and cactus. I have 5 of then to build for my house. That alone will pay for the table.

Got the controller, drivers and stand-in nema 23's, working. Took a drawing of the mm motor plate, cleaned it up, converted to DXF, loaded to CAM software, everything turned on, USB plugged in. The drawing came up in CAM window. Black cut lines, blue move lines. Clicked cycle button. The z motor made sounds, the drawing moved the tool location from home to the first cut line. The z motor sounded off again . The lines turned from black and blue to red as the CAM program was running. Looks like CorelDRAW is going to work for 2D and DXF files.

Now I have to continue reading threads.



Thank's

Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Tue 19 July 2011 at 10:16..
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old Fri 29 July 2011, 09:44
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
You can see I've dumped the 23's. Got 4 - 34's 400 in/oz steppers and a 8.3 amp 48v power. I found I've got to dump my control board. I called the developer and he basically said "Plasma!" Going with CandCNC control with THC, MACH3 , SheetCAM, CorelDraw, Hypertherm, keep my gecko's.

The BIG thing now! Move things around in shop, to make room for 4' x 4' plasma table location and build area.

Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Fri 29 July 2011 at 09:47..
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old Fri 29 July 2011, 18:31
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Was wondering when I'm going to get kicked off the forum?

If I'm still around, This thread is fine to be moved to the build section, but not cutting.

Everything is going to be normal until I get going on the x axes build and the x car. Don't want the heavy Machmate car, sorry. Will have the two y motors and total rack and pinion build. The x car won't be so high, I want a much lower profile. Instead of a car, it will be a balanced side car to it's axes. Want to build an engraver on the same car. engraver video Call it a MachPlasma build if you let me stay. The computer and plasma will be up in the air above table, maybe a swing out. Will find a way to build a control table and seat that will swing out from above and below the plasma table. So If I'm going to use the table I'll swing out computer screen, key board, mouse with seat.

A slowdown coming up. I'm in a two car garage now, on the right, shared by my truck. I'm moving into the green outlined area. Single garage with 3 walls and a garage door. Really much more room because I can line equipment up on both sides of the new shop area.


This is actually a drawing of a central air, not install. You can see Their's a clean room next to the new area. 11' x 20' space for the plasma table and the moved equipment.


Vern

Last edited by Vern2; Fri 29 July 2011 at 18:47..
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old Mon 01 August 2011, 16:47
Vern2
Just call me: Vern
 
Gilbert, Arizona
United States of America
Have to make some basic table size decisions.

I want a 4' x 4' table. I don't really need the full 48" working width. I do need to place a fill width 48" sheet on the cutting table. Plus I need to be able to push past the end of the cutting surface some. I'm putting together a drawing, that shows the concept of what I planning. I added 2" to 'x' width and 8" on the 'y' axes. That's for 'y' roller box width and gear box mounting. This will be adjusted for 'y' rack and pinion to rack.

A plasma only problem:

It's a good idea to isolate the cutting surface from the table. Now that brings up, a balance of materal waste and table size.

X axes car balance. The 'x' motor and rack will be installed on opposite side of 'z' car. No aluminum, two flimsy, only way to use it is, clamp it, bolt it. No welding.


Last edited by Vern2; Mon 01 August 2011 at 16:53..
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old Tue 02 August 2011, 06:09
bradm
Just call me: Brad #10
 
Somerville(MA)
United States of America
Make sure you factor in the gantry width and the y car length; your drawings show an actual work area of about 24" x 26". Is that satisfactory?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct motors 4Nm and 6,8Nm tomasptacek Motors & their mountings 0 Wed 26 May 2010 02:25
Newbie needs help with figuring out drive configurations (slaved drive for x-axis) ikeike 701. Motor Drives 5 Mon 04 January 2010 21:06
Slaving a motor - put its drive in parallel to another drive on the same BOB output J.R. Hatcher 70. Control Systems 34 Mon 16 November 2009 09:13
Automation Direct power supply . . . or a Switch Mode MeanWell bfauska 702. Power Supplies 14 Tue 11 August 2009 10:16
MechMate in Arizona Kevin Construction started, but not cutting yet 7 Sat 22 December 2007 10:52


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.