|
|
|||||||
| Register | Options | Profile | Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
Sat 25 January 2014, 13:47
|
|||
|
|||
|
3D scanners .... wow !
Last night I was visiting Alessanro Ranellecci's lab (unterwelt) and the showed me their affordable 3D scanner ... (less than 100 dollars) ...
It's a Microsoft Kinect ... the result are impressive they use it to make 3d portraits to be printed on a 3d printer ... here you find a base for more information: http://www.virtumake.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=250 http://skanect.manctl.com/ 
|
|
#2
Sun 26 January 2014, 10:56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting. Would like to see more on this. I have tinkered with David before but like to see a more affordable solution.
|
|
#3
Sun 26 January 2014, 13:21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pete,
I'm going to test one this week ... I'll keep you informed
|
|
#4
Mon 27 January 2014, 05:50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tks for sharing this Sergio
|
|
#5
Mon 27 January 2014, 12:45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cool results (if it works like the video
 )
|
|
#6
Mon 27 January 2014, 16:03
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have seen the results personally, both the scanning and 3d printing ... very good. I hope to test a kinect with the mechmate as soon I have it working on my pc :-) ... I miss the usb adapter at the moment ...
|
|
#7
Tue 28 January 2014, 00:11
|
|||
|
|||
|
cool, let us know ! The other day I had a business client with exactly such a problem. We could not draw the shap in CAD for him, as he needed an excact copy of something, which we then had to adapt. It also did not fit under a machine for probing either. Some inquires showed that companies capable of 3d scanning charge big bucks for turning an object into a 3d CAD file, so it could be a worthwhile thing if you can offer that reliable and affordably to clients and have a CNC or 3d printer to produce the object.
|
|
#8
Tue 28 January 2014, 02:08
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes Fox, that's exacly what I'm looking for ... it would complete our capacity ....
the precision you should expect is around 1mm, not so bad ... I know there is a short range similar sensor that is even better .... unfortunately it's not available anymore at the moment (apple bought the company) it's called Carmine 1.09 ...
|
|
#9
Tue 28 January 2014, 09:06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Auch... 1 mm is too course, unless for larger statues or something.
0,1 mm would be more usuable as a resolution, but that's probably why the commercial versions are more expensive .
|
|
#10
Tue 28 January 2014, 11:09
|
|||
|
|||
|
with a 170cm tall person, 1mm resolution is good. but for the price, don't u think 0.1mm is asking too much?
|
|
#11
Tue 28 January 2014, 15:06
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would think that as technology evolves the price would come down on the older stuff. This however does not seem to be the case yet with 3D technologies. I have had good results with David with being able to get the texture from an orange and a couple of ornaments. But I have not put much time or effort in building up the required steppers to get better control environment.
|
|
#12
Tue 28 January 2014, 16:09
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fox, I think I have difficulties on explaining well ... but the sistem resolved the hairs of the girl better than 30k $ scanners ... I intended 1 mm error not resolution ... But things have to be tested better and I can't tell much as I did not nor I am an epert ... but I am very confident.
My idea is to have something that can give me a good base for "replicate" object,ornaments or use strange pieces of wood (maybe just irregular surfaces). And as Ken said ... 1mm on a 1.7 meters is not bad at all.
|
|
#13
Tue 28 January 2014, 16:17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am still interested in your trials. Please keep us informed.
|
|
#14
Wed 29 January 2014, 04:46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok I see, still interested as well. For my sample case I spoke about 1 mm deviation would not have been acceptable hence my response. Not intended to demotivate you or such !
|
|
#15
Wed 29 January 2014, 05:25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Fox, don't worry ! just testing understandig and sharing
|
|
#16
Wed 29 January 2014, 10:54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fox, if you need 0.01mm resolution try structured light scanning
However, new projectors are more expensive then a Kinect sensor, I'm actually surprised to find out.
|
|
#17
Wed 29 January 2014, 12:09
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#18
Wed 29 January 2014, 14:04
|
|||
|
|||
|
SLS has some disadvantages too. I have not found a 100% system yet that will handle everything. That is why I am glad new approaches are being made because it should help drive the price down on these scanners in order to stay competitive.
|
|
#19
Fri 31 January 2014, 04:04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ros, those are common examples, but they limit your scanning to the heigth of your gantry / bed to center of your lathe. Ideally you would want a handheld scanner, with good accuracy to be flexible with larger 3d objects to be scanned.
Another note a crazy DIY option for large objects: http://www.instructables.com/id/Mult...anner/?lang=pt
|
|
#20
Fri 30 May 2014, 03:39
|
|||
|
|||
|
3D scanners and printers are fantastic, I wish I have one of these...
|
|
| Register | Options | Profile | Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Computersculpture.com for 3d scanners, CAD software, CAM software, and Desktop Mills | awerby | The Market Place | 7 | Mon 04 May 2009 08:23 |
